Platforms, drivers, vehicles, and regional markets need to obtain relevant qualifications and require the removal of non-compliant drivers and vehicles. Coupled with the frequent occurrence of security incidents, the overall development of online car-hailing has almost stagnated. A status quo that cannot be ignored is that under the dominance of Didi, the market coverage of rising stars is still limited. Geely, Shouqi, BAIC, GAC, BMW, JAC, Volkswagen, etc. have successively launched their own online car-hailing platforms; in addition, independent third-party platforms such as

Dida, Hello Travel, T3 and other travel and rise. In contrast, other platforms with significant scale differences from Didi have advantages in vehicles, services, and qualifications, but still need sms marketing service to be improved in front-end traffic and back-end market coverage. Mode pros and cons It's not just China's car-hailing that is in trouble, but the world is facing similar problems. Uber has previously claimed that it is not in a hurry to go public, but at present it would rather "discount" its valuation and will soon land in the capital market. Loss is the first nightmare of the current car-hailing platform. In 2018, Uber lost $1.8 billion; Lyft lost $900 million;

Didi lost 10.9 billion yuan. Taking Didi as an example, it currently occupies 87% of the private car market, and the online car-hailing even reaches 99%, but it is still in a state of loss. It can be seen that after the merger, there is no scale effect, and even under the existing model,